Posted in Anti-gun Derangement Syndrome, Big Brother, Hollywood, Mainstream Media, Movies, Politics, Racism, Trump-Derangement-Syndrome

Surprised by “Joker”

Thought-provoking, moving, surprising

5-Star. I highly recommend seeing Joker, starring Joaquin Phoenix, if for nothing more than to support the screenwriters, actors, and others who brought it to market despite the relentless vitriol hurled against them.

Interesting isn’t it, how the acceptability of Anti-White+Anti-Male rhetoric these last two-plus years has created a perfect storm to psychologically batter Joker, a film whose genesis began back in 2016.

“Violence and gore” of Joker is minor…

Comparatively speaking. If you have watched and survived any of these films from my favorite genre ((Vengeance) which I also highly recommend) you will be fine with Joker:

  • Thomas Jane’s 2004 Punisher (rated R);
  • Charles Bronson’s 1974 and Bruce Willis’ 2018 Death-Wish, both (R);
  • Denzel Washington’s 2014 Equalizer (R);
  • Jodie Foster’s 2007 female Death-Wish, The Brave One (R); and lastly,
  • Keanu Reeve’s 2014 John Wick (R).

So, turns out the MSM lied (#LOL)

As the credits barely began rolling, I realized that the gas-lighting MSM’s #GreatWhiteFear of Joker was pure illusion. It was just another manufactured Anti-White+Anti-Male con job dredged up from the most putrid part of their tiny twisted minds.

From an amateur psychologist’s perspective, their entire hate-plus-fear Joker campaign was probably all Projection. Might these jackbooted Saville Row suited self-appointed thought police fear that another month, day, moment even, of Trump-Derangement-Syndrome fever will push them into going-Joker? Not on someone across the street, but right there at work, just down the hall, or perhaps across into the next cubicle?

Thanks, media-jokers

Basically it’s all thanks to those plain-clothes-opinion-cops. They got me out to the theater on Saturday, the 6th, to see the film. Because seriously, I only started paying attention to it when it seemed to be causing the MSM to lose the very last of its collective mind. They seemed to beg readers and listeners to STAY HOME…AVERT YOUR EYES…or else…so of course I did the opposite. (If this was a psyop meant to get Hollywood some extra bucks, color me duped.)

Meanwhile, 7 Shot Dead in Chiraq (MSM: “Yawn.”)

I’m actually convinced a few of these “tastemakers” are secretly disappointed some stoic young White man, sitting uncomfortably astride his AR (Armalite Rifle not “assault”) with a gazillion-round “clip” attached, didn’t actually go all Joker on the crowd. I mean, think of the lost 24/7 ratings’ boost another “gun violence” tragedy would create.

Instead, for the week of September 29th-October 5th seven folks were shot and killed in Chiraq, probably not by young White men.

*SPOILER ALERT*

What impressed me

1) The SCRIPT writing from start to finish was tight.

2) The STORY PROGRESSION was in a straight time-line for the most part (making it double-plus-good IMO).

3) The TWISTS were masterful and you’ll chastise yourself later, “I shoulda seen them comin’!”

4) The Characterizations, especially of Thomas Wayne, were succinct and convincing. No cheaply inserted Voice-Over backstories needed.

5) The FINAL SCENE plays like a minimalistic silent-film. Think 2001: A Space Odyssey, wherein Dave is crazy and confined in an orbiting asylum.

What depressed me

1) The Setting. I had no idea the film was set back (nearly) 40 years. The murky yellow-brown cast to everything and the late 1970’s cars gave its era away pretty much immediately. The only thing missing was a dusty mirrored disco-ball abandoned in the alleyway.

2) The two nearly identical BEAT-DOWNS of the main character (one by Brown teenage street-thugs, the other by White 20s-30s middle-class Wall Street professionals), all the while knowing no Hero would be coming to save a nobody like him.

3) The HUMILIATION of the main character: prior to his “diverse” gang-beatings and then by an old White man (TDS sufferer Robert De Niro’s character) widely broadcast before and then again during his TV talk-show appearance.

4) ANTICIPATING the FAILURE of the main character if he ever did try a live comedy performance, followed by the excruciating moments when he actually got onstage. And (shocker!) failed horrendously.

5) Seeing the beating-bruises combined with Phoenix’s painfully gaunt and downright deformed body. (What is going on with his shoulders?)

What I hated

1) Realizing my own lack of empathy/understanding for someone who survived a childhood filled with torture, both physical and mental.

2) How quickly I condemned Fleck for his crimes without acknowledging that he had a “breaking point.” This lead me to become…

Judge, Jury, Executioner

By the start of the credits I had dropped my gavel and pronounced a swift Death Sentence on Arthur Fleck. After all, a mere moment’s reflection convinced me – as a viewer – that anyone as clever and deadly as Fleck could not, should not be imprisoned for Life. He’d likely kill all or at least some of his caretakers. Oh, and beyond those dangers, consider the cost to we the taxpayers!!!

Then I reflected some more

I realized those in danger of Joker’s murderous rage were not random innocents. It’s almost like they should have known they were on his “list.”

So who did Arthur Fleck kill if it wasn’t random school kids cowering in their apartments as the Joker sprayed bullets at his gang-rivals in the street, or if it wasn’t lone shuffling bent-over senior citizens blindly bumping into Arthur here and there on the streets of Gotham?

Joker was “only” a danger to…

1) Those who abused him, or

2) Those who were clearly uninterested in or dismissed his abuse with minimal further thought (“professional listener” in hospital, Thomas-helper-of-the-people-Wayne), or

3) Those who lied to him (his mother), or

4) Those who lied about him brazenly, making him a criminal solely by virtue of those lies (his co-worker), or

5) Those who chose to publically harm or humiliate him (White Wall Street subway thugs), for their own personal status-gain (TV talk-show personality even did it with malice aforethought).

Verdict

I give him a Life-sentence in a “country club” prison like Butner Federal Prison Camp, alongside Bernie Madoff and other bigtime financial-scallywags. Is killing seven six people outright actually worse than destroying the lives of hundreds to thousands through fraud and theft?  I’m sure surviving family members and those directly ripped off by Butner’s white-collar thieves wouldn’t shed a single tear if inmate Arthur Fleck went all Joker on them after suffering through one too many of their put-downs.

Hope springs eternal

Here’s hoping the MSM will one day learn how many of us are onto them..and that we are just plain ignoring everything they say unless it’s to fact-check them. Or laugh maniacally at them!

 

Posted in "Humor", Cartoons, Collectivists, Faith, Politics, progressives, Trump-Derangement-Syndrome

Dear (cartoonist) Chris Britt: you’re a hypocrite. Signed, Mary Jo

This cartoonist makes me sick

I couldn’t find the original on Britt’s Creators.com page, so here’s a screengrab from a Breitbart story where I first saw it earlier today:

ChrissBritt_prayercartoon_breitbartgrab

Posted in Economics, Education, Graphic Design, Hollywood, Peaceful Parenting

I have several new jobs for the “Punisher”

Hollywood_Needs_to_Burn_to_the_Ground_forGab2

Listened to an eye-opening interview that Stefan Molyneux had with Gabe Hoffman, a principal on a documentary called, “An Open Secret,” about the child-rape business endemic in Hollywood. I guarrentee you will feel as incensed as I do after you watch it, for free, on VIMEO here. Please share it widely. More of us need to withhold what that industry craves more than it does our little boys…our box-office bucks.

There is only one truly just “sentence” for this kind of Evil: death.

Posted in Diversity, Liberty, Politics

The #ObamaLegacy: no, not @Cliffs_Notes, rather, the John(magnum) version. #MAGA

Found this in the comments to an article, “Anti-Trump rioters brawl — with each other!” HERE.

Dear Leader’s legacy is nothing to laugh about tho:

  1. + Destroyed our national sovereignty
  2. + Destroyed healthcare
  3. + Destroyed the sanctity of marriage
  4. + Turned race relations back 100 years
  5. + Attacked the Police and Praised Criminals
  6. + Quadrupled the number of people on food stamps
  7. + Restarted the Cold War
  8. + Destroyed our Allies and Supported our Enemies
  9. + Turned our Military into a gay bath house
  10. + Reverted the middle east back into the middle ages
  11. + Turned the IRS and NSA into the KGB
  12. + Doubled the national debt
  13. + Infested America with Foreign Diseases (i.e. TB, Ebola, ???)
  14. + Wasted Billions of taxpayer $ on the Scam of “Global Warming”
  15. + Greatly empowered and supported Islamic radicals
  16. + Flooded America with illegal Aliens, Muslims and Africans
  17. + Taken over the Internet – If you like your Internet you can keep it!

Feel free to add on !!

Posted in anti-White, Diversity, Political Correctness

I agree that something’s not right

Poster_NYT_MichaelBrown_v_UniBomber

After quickly reading both snippets I must agree with the meme’s sentiment but in an unintended way.

I see both selections as too touchy-feely to have been considered “journalistic.” They provide us too few facts about two wildly different sorts of individuals and leave viewers (we are not really “readers” as we don’t have either selection in its entirety) with a false sense of understanding. Michael Brown was of course in the infancy-stage of criminality and who knows, maybe he never would have stolen anything again, nor used illegal substances again. Regardless, compared to the romantic portrayal of the UnaBomber on the right, I grant that the molecularly thin Positive Spray-Coating the NYT (cleverly) applied to the Brown piece on the left IS harder to see. Ted K., the UnaBomber, was of course never excoriated by the liberal media as other violent types have been; he’s practically meant to be worshipped here (also from the NYT we are to presume): he was living a hippy dippy woodsy lifestyle; an organic back-to-Nature dude who provided them the ultimate example of an activist, literally a Social Justice Warrior. UnaB ate, drank, slept, and exploded the leftists’ own late-1960’s down-with-the-System beliefs (Weather-kaboom-Underground, anyone?). UnaB got out of his armchair (presuming he even had one) and took his fight directly to The Man.

Jordan Lebeau, a Black writer at Boston.com, agrees wholeheartedly with the straightforward intention of the meme-maker; JL sees the NYT as having written a gotcha-piece on Michael Brown. He thinks a white guy dying-young in similar circumstances would never have his past brought up like MB’s is in the NYT. Well, if that’s true then I’d suggest Lebeau (I didn’t want to “register” to leave this comment for him) needs to take it up with The Times as well as everywhere and every other time he actually sees such bias, rather than try and make me or any other White person feel guilty when facts about the living or dead are revealed.

But now consider the NYT’s clever use of language on the M. Brown side of the above meme/poster – as well as the juxtaposition of terms in several of those paired thoughts:
1) the “was NO ANGEL (-),” gives the initial impression this is a negative piece, but keep reading carefully;

2) “both PROBLEMS (-) and PROMISE (+) in his YOUNG (+) life;” we are left with the + terms ringing in our ears; “young” typically implies innocent; merely reading some of his rap “lyrics” will clue you in that MB was no naive child;

3) “his ENCOUNTER (+ or neutral) with Officer Wilson;” Confrontation-with or Questioning-by or Stop-by would have been negative in that it would indicate to most readers the cop likely had some probable-cause to act;
4) “the POLICE (-) SAY (+/-) he was caught on security camera;” as opposed to witnesses’ statements or judging for oneself by looking at the footage on the internet;

5) A 6’3” nearly 300 lb. guy, “PUSHING (+/-) the (passive, puny by comparison) clerk…into a display case;” imagine if it had been a FEMALE clerk; with that great a physical disparity there’s hardly any doubt it would have been called an ASSAULT (-);

6) A community with, “ROUGH PATCHES;” huh? What does this mean other than perhaps excusing MB for dealing with it through escapism…

7) “…he DABBLED IN (+) drugs and alcohol;” in fact he was a CRIMINAL (-) (by virtue of the drug use, who knows at what ages he used booze); dabbled-in sounds downright playful and appeals perfectly to the NYT’s readership;

8) “producing lyrics…by turns CONTEMPLATIVE (+) and VULGAR (-/+); now Contemplative makes him sound practically like a poet; we all know there’s nothing wrong with vulgar lyrics; that’d be judgmental against an entire segment of the Music Industry built upon vulgarity;

9) A “SCUFFLE (neutral or +) with a neighbor;” scuffle could be bad, but absent details it could sound downright childlike, but, question: how do we know about this, were charges brought then dropped; was blood spilled but no cops called?

So what say you…anti-Black Bias? clever Opinion-Shaping? or plain old Piss-Poor “Reporting?”